
Technology finally answered my prayers. FastPencil is a new self-publishing site that allows writers to publish and get immediate feedback for their work. A recent blog in the NY Times discusses the benefits of this new technology.



“If I’m not going to like it, I don’t want to hear it.” I have repeatedly told this phrase to my friend Bianca, also known as “the bearer of bad news”, yet she continues to tell me things I genuinely do not want to know. A few days ago, at one of our weekly get-togethers at her apartment, she casually informed me that my kindergarten boyfriend, the love of my life at that time, kissed half the girls in our class while he was with me. Needless to say, I absolutely did not want to know this. Why would she ruin my perfect childhood romance by revealing that my beloved was a little Casanova? I would have rather lived happily in my ignorance with my false, yet perfect, image of my first love. That brings me to the question, is not-knowing, as a rule of thumb, better than knowing?
Are less intelligent people happier than more intelligent ones? Since intelligence is a fairly subjective matter, for practical reasons, let us refer to it in terms of knowledge.
The General Social Survey asks a certain group of individuals about happiness and tells them to complete a basic vocabulary test as a measure of intelligence. The people are divided into top, middle, and bottom categories according to their levels of intelligence. The survey showed no significant discrepancy in the happiness of the top, middle, and bottom categories. Nevertheless, when it came to unhappiness, only 8% of the top and middle sections claimed to be unhappy, while 14% in the bottom third declared themselves as unhappy.
In our modern era where capitalism rules the world, one would logically assume that intelligent people are happier. Brains get you higher-paying jobs and money brings you happiness; simple as that. The successful corporate lawyer, who graduated from Harvard, surely appears to be more content with his life than the unemployed fellow who was not smart enough to even get into college.
It is not a challenge to conclude that knowledge, when involving one’s degree of intelligence, leads to success and, therefore, happiness. Yet, when it comes to non-intellectual knowledge, can we arrive to the same conclusion? My friend Bianca did me no favor by telling me my kindergarten boyfriend was outrageously unfaithful to me. When I found this out, my life was not positively affected. If anything, it was negatively affected. I was happier not knowing of my lover’s infidelities. My ignorance certainly did not hurt me in any way. Here, I can affirm that my ignorance was, indeed, bliss. Yet I cannot make a generalization based on my trivial situation.
For the most part, in exception to my mild heartbreak, ignorance does not lead to bliss. Think about it this way: success brings happiness and success without knowledge is practically unfeasible. Great things cannot be accomplished by living in the darkness. Of course there will always be instances in which we are better off being ignorant. I myself have agreed to this by posing the example of my adulterous childhood boyfriend. As Anatole France said, “A person is never happy except at the price of some ignorance.” Evidently it is up to one’s judgment to decide when to opt for ignorance and when to opt for knowledge. Yet, as rational individuals, in most life situations, we are aware of when we are being ignorant- we are aware that there is a reality out there that we have not yet been exposed to. Sooner than later, we are bound to be awakened to such reality and the longer we have lived in a perfect lie, the cruder our awakening will be. A happy fool is only happy for so long.




Let’s face it! Chivalry is dead, corny romance has passed away, and lust is the new love. Nowadays people are obsessed with sex, blood, danger, sadomasochism, fangs, and the embodiment of them all: vampires.
Lady Gaga arrived at the Heathrow Airport wearing one of her signature leotards and vampire fangs, American Idol finalist Adam Lambert dressed up as a glamorous vampire in an all-black suite this past Halloween, and the Twilight cast seems to be in the cover of almost every magazine. It is not an overstatement to say that blood-sucking characters have invaded the media.
HBO’s True Blood reached a whopping 12 million viewers in 2009. The show’s plot revolves around the coexistence of vampires and humans in the small town of Bon Temps, Louisiana where suspense, crime, and sex reign. According to television critic April MacIntyre, Alan Ball, the show’s creator, has “artfully blended gore, romance, humor and horror into a modern day ‘Dark Shadows,’ with cliffhangers and a dash of camp.”
According to CW’s ratings, Vampire Diaries has twice as many viewers as Gossip Girl. Nylon magazine’s February issue featured the series’ young actors and referred to the show as “Dawson’s Creek with less talk and more action.”
The alleged precursor of the vampire phenomenon is no other than Stephanie Meyers’ book series turned movie saga Twilight. Its most recent movie, New Moon was the biggest opening-day box office hit on record, surpassing last year’s box office hit movie The Dark Night. The series takes a more romantic approach on the portrayal of its characters, yet the blood and danger are still present- two elements that cannot be suppressed from the stories’ plot.
Why are people so obsessed with vampires? What is so captivating about characters that want to suck your blood? For starters, not all vampires are killers. Unlike 90’s show Buffy: the Vampire Slayer, today’s media portrays vampires as friends not foe. Not all vampires are hostile. Some are friendly individuals that can interact with humans despite their temptation to feed on them. Vampires are dangerous, and who doesn’t love playing with danger? Part of this fascination has to do with a sadomasochistic nature. “I think it’s sexy when a guy bites me. I sometimes ask my boyfriend to bite my neck really hard.” Allie P, Parsons student, tells me. Vampires are sexual characters. The idea of them craving one’s blood and inducing pain upon one is thrilling. Moreover, people are always intrigued by the supernatural. “They are immortal, strong, sexy, and mysterious”, Blanca Benavides, another Parsons student, says about her blood-sucking idols.
Of course, not everyone is a fan of vampires. Not only do they have fictional enemies, but also real life ones. “I don’t like the whole blood, biting essence of vampires. I’m not into that,” Vicki Sotiros, 19, says. Groups such as “Vampire Haters” and “Twilight is So Dumb” have recently appeared in the Facebook network. “Honestly this vampire shit is getting on my nerves so much. Edward looked like a crack addict in the movie,” Ahmer Kidwai, creator of the latter group, says. Apparently, he did indeed watch the movie, which brings me to my next point: love them or hate them, one cannot escape the vampire phenomenon.
Vampires are the super heroes, or anti-heroes, of our generation. They scare, they intrigue, they captivate. They personify sex, desire, danger, and power. If Buffy were still in the picture and tried to slay Edward Cullen or Bill Compton, she would have probably been crushed by a mass of raging vampire fans.